Hockey Playoff Best Of 5 Or 7
As the NHL playoffs are in full swing, fans and analysts alike are debating the merits of the best-of-five versus best-of-seven series. Some argue that the shorter series allows for more upsets and excitement, while others believe that the longer series ensures that the best team wins. So, which is better for the NHL playoffs? Let's take a closer look.
Best-of-Five Series
In a best-of-five series, the first team to win three games advances to the next round. This format was used in the NHL playoffs from 1980 to 1986 and then again from 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Many fans appreciate this format because it creates more opportunities for underdogs to pull off upsets. A lower-seeded team may only need to win three games to knock off a top-seeded team, rather than the four games required in a best-of-seven series.
Another advantage is that the shorter series can create more drama and higher stakes in each game. Every game becomes a must-win situation, and a team can't afford to lose momentum for even a single game. This can lead to some intense and exciting hockey.
However, there are also some drawbacks to the best-of-five format. For one, injuries and bad bounces can have a bigger impact on the outcome of a shorter series. A team that loses a key player for a game or two may not have enough time to regroup and recover, as they would in a best-of-seven series.
Another potential issue is that the best-of-five format may not accurately determine the best team in a given series. A team that wins three games in a row may not necessarily be better than a team that wins two games and loses the third in overtime. The shorter series can create more randomness and luck in the outcomes.
Best-of-Seven Series
In a best-of-seven series, the first team to win four games advances to the next round. This format has been used in the NHL playoffs since 1987 and is the current format for all rounds. Many fans appreciate this format because it ensures that the best team wins. A team that wins four out of seven games has shown that they are better over a longer period of time than a team that wins three out of five.
Another advantage of the best-of-seven format is that it allows for more strategy and adjustments between games. A team that loses one game can go back to the drawing board and make changes for the next game. Injuries and fatigue can also be better managed over a longer series.
However, there are also some drawbacks to the best-of-seven format. For one, it can be more predictable and less exciting than the best-of-five format. A top-seeded team may breeze through a series without much drama, and a lower-seeded team may not have enough time to mount a comeback.
Another potential issue is that the longer series can lead to fatigue and injuries. A team that has to play seven games in a row may not be as fresh or healthy as a team that only had to play five games. This can make it harder for the best team to win, as injuries can have a bigger impact over a longer series.
Conclusion
So, which is better for the NHL playoffs: best-of-five or best-of-seven? The answer is not so clear-cut. Both formats have their advantages and disadvantages, and ultimately it comes down to personal preference. Some fans may prefer the excitement and drama of the best-of-five format, while others appreciate the more strategic and accurate best-of-seven format.
One thing is for sure, however: regardless of the format, the NHL playoffs always provide some of the most exciting and intense hockey of the year.
